
Dustin McCann, Danielle McCafferty, Josh Ayers and Noah Wright |
Welcome!
As seniors,
we were faced with the decision of what we wanted to do for our
capstone design class. We were given choices ranging from
research based projects like designing and creating solar energy
availability software and non-point source polluting lawn mowers to
design based projects like the human powered submarine and the clean
snowmobile. We all decided that we were more interested in doing
a design project than a research project and really liked the idea of
being able to put our ideas to the test by competing against other
schools from all over the United States. This left the clean
snowmobile project.
Once the project was chosen, we decided to take on
the task of noise, vibration and harshness. In the past, this has
been an area where we have not well at in competition. This year
however, the noise test was modified to follow an SAE standard, making
it a much more reliable and repeatable test. With this knowledge
we started our research. Once we had a copy of the standard, we
were able to design our testing to mimic that of competition. We
found where on the sled the noise was the loudest and focused on those
areas.
A couple of the areas of loud noise were from
under the cowling and around the clutch. We were able to get
samples of material to test and using sound testing equipment we were
able to find which materials would best suit our needs for those areas
of concern.
Another area of a lot of noise was the track.
There was a lot of friction noise between the track and the
runners and there was also some noise from track slap. In order
to fix this, we decided to add a couple more rows of idler wheels.
To find where the best places were to install the added wheels,
we painted the runners and ran the sled around the yard and the
inspected the runners to see where the paint had rubbed off the most.
Adding additional idler wheels would lift the track off the
runners in those areas.
After another round of testing we found that we were
successful in reducing the amount of noise that was coming from the
snowmobile. Infact, we were able to reduce the noise by 8.2
decibels.
We placed 5th at competition, 103 points behind 1st
place. However, we were not able to
finish the endurance run due to sled cooling problems. In our week long investigation into the
cooling problem, several de-modifications were made to the snowmobile slightly
degrading the sled’s noise performance; however the snowmobile was able to make
it through all of the events. The clutch
fan worked as designed, keeping the clutch compartment at a reasonable
temperature and the modifications to the track and suspension were several of
the most talked about features at the competition. As far as the key performance events were
concerned, we finished 2nd in noise only 0.3 dB louder than the leader. We also received the award for most practical
design.
We have enjoyed working on this project and hope
that next years group is able to take over from where we left off and
improve on the noise reduction even more.
|