The Center for Science and Mathematics Education Research at The University of Maine integrates research in student learning, research in teacher beliefs, and assessment of curricula into University-based research and training in science and mathematics education.

The main objectives of the Center are to:

• rebuild introductory courses in mathematics and the sciences based on mathematics-, chemistry-, earth science-, and physics-centered education research
• create attractive, content-rich teacher preparation and continuing education options for mathematics and science teachers that integrate content and pedagogy
• spearhead partnerships with public school teachers and University faculty to understand how student interest and achievement in mathematics and science are enhanced
• develop materials to form the basis for a statewide or national curriculum based on cultivating mathematics and science thinking through inquiry models.

The Center aims to become a source of well-qualified science and mathematics teachers for grades K-12 as well as a leader in creating coherent, developmentally-appropriate curricula for mathematics and science for grades 6-16.

Center projects are funded by the U.S. Department of Education Fund for the Improvement of Education Award Number R125K010106, the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and a gift from the Fleet National Bank, a Bank of America Company and Trustee of the Lloyd G. Balfour Foundation. For further information about the Center and its projects, please contact Professor Susan R. McKay, Center Director.

This project is a collaborative effort among three campuses of the University of Maine System and the Maine Mathematics and Science Alliance; the three campuses are the University of Maine at Farmington, The University of Maine, and the University of Southern Maine. The main purposes of the project are to

• increase the number of qualified teachers of mathematics and science (6-12) in the state of Maine;
• improve the quality of the teacher education programs at each of the three campuses by bringing together faculty from the colleges of education, faculty from the colleges of arts and sciences, students in the different programs, and K-12 in-service teachers in mathematics and science to work collaboratively toward these goals. 

Teacher preparation is the responsibility of faculties of both colleges of arts and sciences and colleges of education. Only through the integration of correct content and effective pedagogy can we provide the best education to K-16 children.

This project is funded by the National Science Foundation's Division of Undergraduate Education Collaboratives for Excellence in Teacher Preparation (CETP) program award number 9987444.

*NOTE: Although workshops do not require pre-registration, we request that you sign up for Monday and Tuesday afternoon workshops at the registration desk (Wells Lobby)
when picking up your registration material.  Sign up sheets are attached to conference bulletin boards.

*NOTE: Although workshops do not require pre-registration, we request that you sign up for Monday and Tuesday afternoon workshops at the registration desk (Wells Lobby)
when picking up your registration material.  Sign up sheets are attached to conference bulletin boards.

Gabriela C. Weaver
Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
gweaver@purdue.edu

Thomas J. Greenbowe
Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University, Ames, IA
tgreenbo@iastate.edu

In collaboration with the Iowa State University Physics Education Research Group, we have investigated students’ understanding of simple constant pressure calorimetry experiments involving physical processes and chemical processes. Physical processes involving calculations, for example calculating the specific heat of a metal by placing a hot piece of metal in cold water, does not pose much difficulty for students. Conceptual understanding of thermochemistry does pose a problem for students. Heat and thermal phenomena have been the subject of considerable investigation in the science education literature, but calorimetry has received little attention from science education researchers. We have developed a series of web-based computer simulations and guided inquiry tutorials to help student confront difficult topics in calorimetry. Our presentation will include a detailed analysis of student performance on solution calorimetry problems in an introductory university chemistry class for science and engineering majors. Data from written classroom exams and from several case studies will be discussed. Our findings reveal a number of learning difficulties. Students have difficulty with vocabulary terms involving thermochemistry, the law of conservation of energy, net changes in temperature of the solution (∆T), and understanding the energy exchanged by a chemical reaction with the solution is due to bond breaking and bond forming during a chemical reaction.

David E. Meltzer
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA
dem@iastate.edu

In collaboration with the Iowa State Chemistry Education Research Group, we have carried out a series of investigations into student learning of thermodynamics in both physical and chemical contexts. We analyzed a wide range of data including student answers on free-response exams, students' written explanations of their reasoning, and extended one-on-one interviews with students. We have found significant learning difficulties related to fundamental concepts including the first and second laws of thermodynamics, behavior of systems undergoing cyclic processes, and the origin of heat transfer in chemical reactions. We have begun development and testing of curricular materials based on this research, aimed at helping students resolve some of these learning difficulties. We are also extending both the research and the curriculum development to more advanced topics typically covered in junior- and senior-level courses, such as statistical thermodynamics and analysis of free energies.

Gregg Swackhamer
Glenbrook North High School, Northbrook, IL
pswackhamer@glenbrook.k12.il.us

"Modeling" is a set of instructional design principles that guide teachers in the construction and selection of materials and activities for students and also in their classroom practice. Because science knowledge is organized around models, physics students engage a small set of desired models through guided inquiry. Guided inquiry is a mode of instruction in which classroom materials and activities are arranged so that students will confront essential features of these models and also some of the typical student difficulties that often frustrate understanding. We will examine the effect of Modeling in physics instruction on student understanding, problem-solving, retention of understanding, and also on student beliefs about science and learning. Although there are no easy solutions to teaching and learning physics, at least in some respects Modeling has produced significant desirable results for a large fraction of teachers trained through Modeling Workshops.

Fred M. Goldberg, Ben Williams and April Maskiewicz
Center for Research of Mathematics and Science Education, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA
fgoldberg@sciences.sdsu.edu

In the Physics for Elementary Teachers curriculum, college students work in small groups to develop ideas in physics.  As part of a broader effort to study how students learn in a technology-rich collaborative learning environment we investigated how a group of three students came to make sense of the observation that both heavier and lighter objects can fall together (in situations where air resistance is not an important factor).  We provide here preliminary findings from this study, focusing on how prior knowledge, the curriculum structure, classroom norms, and social interaction all seem to play a critical role in promoting learning within the group.  Information about the PET curriculum is available at http://cpucips.sdsu.edu/web/pet.

*Supported by NSF Grant ESI-0138900.

John R. Thompson and Michael C. Wittmann
Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Maine, Orono, ME
thompsonj@maine.edu

We discuss a course graduate-level course in Physics Education Research being offered as part of The University of Maine Masters of Science in Teaching (MST) program. As part of our course development, we have conducted research on graduate students’ and teachers’ understanding of content, pedagogy, and education research. In addition to an overview of the course, we also present evidence that students in this course can anticipate student responses indicative of common difficulties and can acquire a critical eye for assessment.

Back to Top

Eric J. Knuth
School of Education, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
knuth@education.wisc.edu

In this session, results will be presented from a research project that seeks to understand the development of middle school students' competencies in justifying and proving. The primary focus of the session will be on the nature of the justifications students produce for their solutions to a variety of mathematics tasks. Data from written assessment items and interviews will be used to illustrate the results. Implications regarding instructional practices and curricular designs necessary to support the development of students' competencies in justifying and proving will also be discussed.

Daniel C. Orey
The Department of Teacher Education, California State University, Sacramento, CA
orey@csus.edu

The Algorithm Collection Project is to collect and disseminate alternative algorithms in mathematical problem solving. Participants gather and study the four basic operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication and division) in arithmetic. We are especially interested in the unique links between language and the algorithms we use to solve problems. Much of the data collected has been gleaned from interviews from newly arrived immigrant adolescent high school students to Northern California. We are extremely interested in learning how students may have learned and how students do:

• The basic arithmetic operations of addition, subtraction, multiplication and division
• Memorization of basic facts
• Algebra
• Geometry

John E. Donovan II and Richard Beveridge
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Maine, Orono, ME
John.Donovan@umit.maine.edu

In order to measure college students’ disposition towards mathematics we are working to develop a questionnaire, the Mathematical Disposition Survey. Our survey is based upon the Maryland Physics Expectation Survey (MPEX). In this presentation we will discuss findings from a pilot survey with our instrument conducted in Spring 2004 which includes pre and post measures from n = 585 students (there were 585 respondents in the pretest, post test data is currently being evaluated). An authentic means to evaluate this data will be introduced, the Mean Distance from Optimal. We will also discuss the results from an open-ended response item where respondents gave one word to describe their feelings about mathematics and elaborated on their choice.

Elaine V. Howes
College of Education, University of South Florida
Tampa, FL
ehowes@coedu.usf.edu

Elementary science and mathematics teacher educators overwhelmingly consider the enhancement of teacher candidates’ content knowledge to be a significant aspect of our jobs. No research-based consensus yet exists on effective approaches to this work; instructional experiments abound. This presentation addresses our experimentation with employing curriculum planning in mathematics and science methods classes as a vehicle for developing deep, wide, and broad content knowledge.

In particular, we will discuss a troubling paradox at this heart of this endeavor. K-6 teaching candidates consistently maintain that their greatest fear in teaching is being asked a question they cannot

answer. Our (distinct yet similar) curriculum-planning approaches are largely inspired by this fear. It is reasonable to hypothesize that developing the material to be taught in great detail and depth renders teachers both better prepared to address children’s questions and more confident of their readiness. Nevertheless, we perceive our candidates to be largely bewildered by and resistant to a content-knowledge-based process for curriculum planning.

Our presentation will manifest empirical evidence of our struggles with this paradox. We will also draw on the research literature (e.g., Sosniak, 1999) to contextualize and further problematize the issue of curriculum planning as a venue for learning science and mathematics.

Pallavi Jayawant
Department of Mathematics, Bates College, Lewiston, ME
Department of Mathematics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
jayawant@math.arizona.edu

Beliefs play an important role in mathematics learning and teaching. Different groups of students have varied beliefs about mathematics and its learning and teaching. For example, the undergraduates in a college algebra course may have beliefs that positively or negatively impact their learning in the course. What beliefs do they come in with and what beliefs would we like to change during the course and how can we change them? The researchers in the Integrating Mathematics and Pedagogy (IMAP) project have tried to answer such questions for prospective elementary school teachers (Phillip, Clement, Thanheiser, Schappelle, Sowder). They have studied the effects of integrating children’s thinking into the mathematics content courses for prospective elementary school teachers. I will use some of the guiding principles of IMAP to discuss possible applications to research in undergraduate math education.

Dawn C. Meredith
Department of Physics, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH
dawn.meredith@unh.edu

We presented students in the introductory calculus-based physics course with physics problems that required calculus in the solution. However, the need for calculus was not explicitly stated.  We interpret these interviews using the frameworks of Sfard (mathematical conceptions as operational or structural) and Sherin (symbolic forms).  We give evidence of a common progression in understanding of integrals, and note that the understanding of limit and of the integral as a sum may be linked.  We also share some practical ideas for teaching calculus in a physics context.

Joseph S. Krajcik
School of Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
krajcik@umich.edu

Teaching science through a project-based approach allows students opportunities to explore real world problems, make connections between various ideas that they might not have otherwise made, participate in a variety of scientific practices, and see how the principles and concepts of science can explain important and various phenomena in their world. Project-based science also provides teachers with one way to meet the call of the National Science Education Standards that states that inquiry should be the primary mode of instruction for teaching science. Yet, teaching science through this approach brings many challenges even for the most experienced science teachers. Although using a project-based approach appears to provide many opportunities for students as well as for teachers, we need to weigh the benefits and challenges and ask: What evidence exists that teaching science in a project-based approach helps students meet important learning goals? How does the achievement of students who learn science in a project-based environment compare to those who don’t learn science in this type of environment? In this talk, I will explain the features project-based science, discuss the advantages and disadvantages of teaching in a project-based approach, and examine the evidence for and against students learning science in this type of environment.

Julie C. Libarkin
Department of Geological Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, OH
Libarkin@Ohio.edu

Over 5,000 students from more than fifty universities and colleges nationwide participated in a study aimed at developing an assessment instrument for entry-level geo-science courses. Short, open-ended questionnaires from 1000 students and interviews with 200 students provided insight into ideas about the Earth held by entry-level students, and these ideas drove the development of test questions and answers. The test was created in two phases: a small, 29-item test was piloted in Fall 2002 and evaluated using item response theory and qualitative validation techniques. Based upon the success of this initial testing, a second set of 45 questions was created for piloting in Fall 2003. Our experiences with the Geo-science Concept Test indicate that 1) assessment questions created in direct response to student interviews are particularly useful in large-scale testing of student ideas; 2) a variety of qualitative and quantitative measures should be used when creating assessment instruments to ensure validity of the test design and application; and 3) many alternative ideas about the Earth are difficult to modify, as evidenced by small change between pre- and post-test scores nationwide.

Donald B. Young
Curriculum Research & Development Group
College of Education, University of Hawaii at Manoa
young@hawaii.edu

Marshall D. Sundberg
Department of Biological Sciences, Emporia State University, Emporia, KS
sundberm@esumail.emporia.edu

Qualitative assessment techniques are often under-utilized by math and science teachers because they are perceived as "softer" than quantitative instruments. Because the data generated is subjective, it is not amenable to statistical testing and is thus considered to be less reliable and less meaningful. In fact, qualitative assessment can provide a much richer understanding of the learning that actually occurs in the classroom. A combination of the "broad brushstrokes," provided by quantitative instruments, and the "finer detailing" provided by qualitative tools allows the instructor to more critically evaluate the efficacy of instruction and focus more sharply on areas of difficulty. Examples will be provided of how interviews, journal writing, minute papers, and concept mapping can effectively be combined with content pre/post-tests to improve student understanding of difficult and frequently misunderstood concepts involving cell biology, plants, and evolution. Some advantages and disadvantages of each instrument will also be discussed.

Deborah Perkins, The University of Maine, Orono, ME and Darrell King, Brewer High School, Brewer, ME
The University of Maine, Orono, ME; Susan Brawley, Barbara Cole, Susan Hunter, Steve Norton
Ruey Yehle, Hampden Academy, Hampden, ME
Deborah.Perkins@umit.maine.edu

The National Science Foundation (NSF) GK-12 program at Maine (1999-2005) partners excellent graduate students (and 1-2 undergraduates) in science, engineering, and mathematics with excellent teachers in the local grade 3-11 classrooms for approximately 8 hours per week, over a 9-month period. The goals are to promote (1) higher achievement in Maine's Learning Results, (2) better communication and teaching skills, (3) professional development, (4) enriched science for students, (5) effective role models, (6) stronger linkage among science faculty and K-12 districts.

Fellow's major advisors indicate improvement in communication skills and organizational ability, and an increased awareness of the importance of teaching science well. Teachers have reported acquiring significant scientific understanding, greater confidence, and increased self-esteem - the latter partly from attendance at professional meetings. Inquiry-based instruction has increased. Impacts on students include increased utilization of previously unavailable research equipment, increased understanding of and experience in the scientific method, and higher aspirations. Field trips to do natural science, and visits to the research activities at the University have broadened students and teachers awareness of the University's activities. Awareness of the importance of K-12 science education has been enhanced for participating faculty.

Patrick Thompson
Department of Teaching and Learning, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
pat.thompson@vanderbilt.edu

Increased attention to statistics and data modeling is a hallmark of mathematics education reform. I discuss results from a teaching experiment with eight high school statistics teachers that point to meanings and presumptions that are often held tacitly that nevertheless reveal themselves in teachers' actions in ways that confound and confuse already complicated issues.

Fred Goldberg and Steve Robinson, Tennessee Technological University
Center for Research of Mathematics and Valerie Otero,
University of Colorado at BoulderScience Education
San Diego State University, San Diego, CA
fgoldberg@sciences.sdsu.edu

With support from NSF we have developed a one-semester research-based Physics for Elementary Teachers (PET) course that focuses on achieving four main goals: physics content, nature of science, elementary students' ideas, and learning about learning.  Students develop their ideas in a technology-rich collaborative learning environment.  In this presentation I will briefly summarize some interesting aspects of the curriculum: promoting conceptual learning both within class and with web-based tools; and having PET students observe video from elementary classrooms to analyze elementary children's thinking and to make connections with their own learning in the PET classroom.  During the 2003-2004 academic year the curriculum has been piloted at six Universities, and we expect over 25 Universities and two-year colleges to be involved in a larger field-test during 2004-2005. Information about the PET curriculum is available at http://cpucips.sdsu.edu/web/pet.

*Supported by NSF Grant ESI-0138900.

Gideon L. Weinstein
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ
gideon.weinstein@montclair.edu

It is often argued that many secondary mathematics teachers lack the in-depth subject matter knowledge required to successfully implement a meaningful and high-quality mathematics curriculum. A teacher’s mathematical knowledge must be deep and conceptual in order to help students achieve high-quality mathematical understanding, and an unsophisticated understanding of mathematics leads to uninspired teaching. Therefore, it is important to gain a clear understanding of how preservice and practicing teachers relate to the content material and how that relationship influences their teaching philosophies and practices. This presentation reports two case studies of pre-service teachers within a larger longitudinal project tracking intellectual development in mathematics and philosophies of teaching in prospective and practicing teachers. Theories of adult intellectual development provide stage-by-stage developmental frameworks that include descriptions of the generation and verification of general knowledge. I reframed these theories to address "ways of knowing mathematics" – developmental stages for learning and verifying mathematics. I use Ernest (1993) to provide the theoretical underpinning for deep and thorough descriptions of philosophies of mathematics education. In less advanced teachers, absolutist views of knowledge dominate and teaching is seen as an authority-centered activity. More advanced teachers are more effective and student-centered in their teaching and think of knowledge as contextual and socially constructed.

Camille Bell-Hutchinson
School of Education, The University of the West Indies, Mona, Jamaica
camille.bellhutchinson@uwimona.edu.jm

Despite the large body of literature which highlights the negative impact of teaching by rote on the development of mathematical thinking and mathematical understanding, this kind of pedagogy continues to be the hallmark of many mathematics classrooms both locally and internationally. This paper draws upon emerging data from research conducted in two secondary schools in Jamaica and highlights aspects of the pedagogy of two teachers who implemented a thinking-focused intervention in their mathematics classrooms over a period of one year. The paper gives insight into the issues surrounding their intervention and discusses aspects of the emerging data which points to a model for thinking-focused pedagogy in the mathematics classroom.

Marcia Rainford
School of Education, The University of the West Indies, Mona, Jamaica
marcia.rainford@uwimona.edu.jm

The use of continuous assessment to facilitate learning is supported by a constructivist approach to teaching and learning. Teachers are often faced with various dilemmas which interfere with their attempt to use continuous classroom assessment on a sustained basis to improve learning. Various aspects of schooling such as students’ abilities, the need to participate in high stakes examinations, the teacher’s professional competence and school-related factors such as the physical and administrative components, mitigate against the use of classroom assessment in a coordinated and sustained way. The paper proposes a model for implementing the use of classroom assessment that is grounded in classroom practice. The model involves collaborations among the teachers, school administration and students. The paper outlines the process that led to the development of the model and explores the implications for its implementation.

Back to Top

Donald B. Young
Curriculum Research & Development Group
College of Education, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI
young@hawaii.edu

Following ten-plus years of initial development, testing, and revision, sufficient data had been accumulated on the impact of FAST on student learning to generate interest outside Hawaii. Project developers entered into long-term systematic data collection on effectiveness with both students and teachers. External reviews of the quality of the instructional materials, use of appropriate evaluation designs, and examination of the educational significance of outcomes include the U.S. Department of Education's Joint Dissemination Review Panel and the Program Effectiveness Panel, the National Staff Development Council's What Works in the Middle Grades, and the U.S. Department of Education's Expert Panel on Mathematics and Science Education. As a result of the Expert Panel review, FAST was identified as one of only two programs nationally to be named exemplary based on sustained effects on learning over multiple years in multiple sites. This session will highlight some of these findings.

Randal R. Harrington
The Blake School, Minneapolis, MN
rharrington@blakeschool.org

I will describe the development and discuss issues of implementation of a high school physics program that has made use of multiple research-based curricula that includes aspects of Modeling, Physics by Inquiry, CPU, Tutorials in Introductory Physics, and on-line Web based problem solving (WebAssign and Cybertutor). The program starts with Physics First in 9th grade, and includes numerous electives including modern physics, astronomy, electronics, and AP Physics.

Paula Messina
Department of Geology, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA
pmessina@geosun.sjsu.edu

The Earth Sciences have traditionally been viewed as having less "academic prestige" than other science curricula. This perception may (1) depress K-16 enrollments in Earth Science courses, (2) increase placement of lower-performing students in Earth Science courses, and (3) relegate Earth Science instruction to under-qualified educators. These factors may be contributing to a self-fulfilling situation. An Earth Systems course at San José State University has identified the difficulties of, and deficiencies in, a standard high school Earth Science curriculum. Results from this course suggest that one way to enhance student Earth Science understanding is to restructure secondary science curricula to make Earth Science the capstone course. This is aligned with research demonstrating that reversing the traditional science course sequence (by offering Physics in the ninth grade) improves student success in subsequent science courses. Addressing the problem at the college level involves (1) developing Earth Systems courses that account for differing student backgrounds and utilize real-world tasks and hands-on learning, and (2) offering well-crafted workshops for pre-service and in-service Earth Science teachers.

Suzi D. Shoemaker
Casa Verde High School, Casa Verde, AZ
Sdshoe@c2i2.com

This talk will describe an effort to create innovative curriculum materials for the instruction of high school Earth Science. In 1998, I received training in how to teach physics using the Modeling Approach to Physics, and became convinced that this pedagogical approach can be more effective than the traditional use of textbooks, lectures, note-taking, memorization, and laboratories, etc. Generally, a Models Centered Approach to instruction requires that curricula: be activity based; concept rich; and nomenclature poor, with a well-defined concept flow. Over the past two summers I have worked on developing these materials. The products of this effort represent a concept flow using the rock and water cycles as a format, and curriculum materials covering the beginning units: maps, plate tectonics, earthquakes, and volcanic activity.

These curriculum materials are early in their development, but were piloted this spring at Casa Verde High School in Casa Grande, Arizona. Subsequent efforts will include the three rock types and their formation, as well as the beginnings of the water cycle topics. Questions have been raised about the inclusion of Astronomy and Paleontology, but no conclusion has been reached on how to best include (or not include) these topics.

Fred Goldberg
Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education
San Diego State University, San Diego, CA
fgoldberg@sciences.sdsu.edu

CIPS is an NSF-funded curriculum originally designed to help students develop a deep conceptual understanding of the national content and nature of science benchmarks and standards for middle school physical science.** The No Child Left Behind legislation and the plans of states to mandate assessments based on their own set of science standards have led us to expand our original design goal.  We are adding to the core CIPS curriculum additional activities that will help students learn the content included in those state standards that do not match the national ones.  In this talk I will describe the challenges of trying to meet the dual goals of promoting both understanding and coverage, and will indicate how the CIPS staff has decided to meet those challenges.  Information about the CIPS curriculum is at http://cpucips.sdsu.edu/web/CIPS. 

*Supported by NSF Grants ESI- 9812299 and ESI- 0138900
**AAAS Project 2061 Benchmarks for Scientific Literacy (1993, Oxford Press) and the National Science Education Standards (1995, National Academy of Sciences)

Christopher A. Horton
High School of Commerce, Springfield, MA
Cahorton@berkshire.net

I am teaching Algebra I Support for the second year in an inner-city school, to five sections of students selected for their deficiencies in mathematics. On a pre-test, none of these students was able to interpret or perform operations using fractions, ratios or proportions. Among the topics these students have had extreme difficulty with are: setting up a number line, counting distances along it, including and counting zero, performing operations with signed numbers, interpreting subtraction as "finding the difference", the concepts of slope of a line and rate, and solving an equation using division. Not one started with the ability to read a ruler calibrated in English measure. The students persistently focused on and counted boundaries of intervals, rather than the intervals themselves.

I will argue that most or all of these phenomena have at their root a lack of understanding of using numbers to represent intervals in time, distance or other arbitrarily segmented phenomena. I will propose a research project to demonstrate that this is so, that an effective pedagogical approach can be built around the teaching of measurement of physical phenomena, as developed by Jerome Epstein, and that this produces breakthroughs in understanding algebra.

Back to Top

Clyde F. Herreid
National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science
University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY
herreid@acsu.buffalo.edu

Case study teaching is a recent innovation in basic science classrooms. Techniques of instruction within this genre vary enormously but their impact on student learning has not been well evaluated. Nor has the case study method in business and law been seriously evaluated even though the method has been in use for a hundred years. Nonetheless, the few studies that have been designed indicate that the method is highly successful. I will summarize the data from the literature, present our results from a survey of 150 case teachers, and outline our plans for and assessment program that is supported by a National Science Grant.

Richard L. Nafshun
Department of Chemistry, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
nafshunr@chem.orst.edu

William G. Ellis, Jr.
Upward Bound and the School of Marine Sciences,
The University of Maine, Orono, ME
wge@umit.maine.edu

Over a 12-year period, our Upward Bound Math-Science program at the University of Maine has evolved from a traditional math and science curriculum to an integrated curriculum. We currently use group and individual research projects as vehicles to deliver a basic understanding of how research is performed in various fields. We provide tutorials in areas that are needed to successfully complete the research projects such as statistics, graphing, and presentation methods. The student research is showcased in our in-house journal and a poster session modeled after a professional science meeting.

We have been fortunate to have several UMaine faculty members as full-time summer staff who are responsible for the academic structure of the group project and the tutorials. For the individual research projects, we work with the four faculty members plus other faculty and graduate students on the UMaine campus. In addition, we have worked with medical doctors, veterinarians, and other scientists off campus.

This presentation will discuss what has worked for us and which ideas we consider critical to the success of our model. We will also discuss what has not worked from our perspective.

François G. Amar, Barbara Stewart, and Mitchell R.M. Bruce
Department of Chemistry, The University of Maine, Orono, ME
Francois.Amar@umit.maine.edu

InterChemNet (ICN) is a Web-based management program designed to foster active learning in the laboratory. The system allows students choices of discovery-based experiments, a host of background information, and quick and easy access to UV-visible and FTIR spectrometers. The system creates individualized pathways for students by allowing instructors to present a hierarchy of lab choices and assignments in a given week. An evaluation module is integrated into the system to provide immediate feedback for students and evaluation data for instructors. Because assessment is integrated with curriculum delivery, ICN facilitates the introduction of chemical education research into existing courses based on local curricular goals. By making it easy for instructors to analyze learning outcomes for the course, ICN can be used to promote a systematic and evidence-based curriculum development cycle.

Michael C. Wittmann
Department of Physics and Astronomy,
The University of Maine, Orono, ME
wittmann@umit.maine.edu

Members of the University of Maine Physics Education Research Laboratory are bringing modern physics ideas into a general education course for non-science-major students. We have modified materials from proven curricula to match student needs and skills. Students develop basic concepts of quantum physics with an emphasis on observations and building analogies to everyday events and simple intuitive physics situations. We have studied both students' attitudes toward science and students' conceptual reasoning skills. Research methods include the analysis of data from the MPEX2 and written pre- and post-test responses. Students do well at learning some things (such as the nature of knowledge in quantum physics), while having difficulties understanding concepts such energy quantization and quantum tunneling.

Mark W. Anderson
Department of Resource Economics and Policy,
The University of Maine, Orono, ME
Mark.Anderson@umit.maine.edu

Regional accreditation bodies in higher education ask member institutions to establish general education requirements for undergraduates and to assess the learning outcomes resulting from those general education requirements. As part of its General Education requirements, the University of Maine established goals for learning in the area of "population and the environment". An experiment in assessing learning outcomes for students in a course designed to address this area was conducted to measure content learning outcomes and changes in students’ attitudes. Twenty-five content questions and 10 attitudinal questions were asked each of three semesters in a class of approximately 125 students. Students completed the instrument on the first day of class and the last day of class each semester, affording the opportunity to observe changes both within a single class (measuring learning?) and in the same class from semester to semester (measuring response to changes in pedagogy?). Measures of content learning outcomes were used to design changes in both course content and pedagogy. Measures of attitudinal changes provide important, if ethically challenging, information to the instructor on the affective impacts of the course.

Gabriela C. Weaver
Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Location: 219 Little Hall

Inquiry-methods are widely discussed in the research literature as a favored approach for classroom teaching in science. But what IS "inquiry-based" teaching? And does a teacher go about using it? In this workshop we will first discuss and explore the characteristics of inquiry for teaching and learning. Participants will then talk about adapting a lesson from a "traditional" laboratory experiment into an "inquiry-based" lesson. If possible, participants are asked to bring a copy of a traditional laboratory lesson that they would like to adapt to inquiry-based methods.

Julie C. Libarkin
Department of Geological Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, OH
Location: 203 Little Hall

This workshop will provide a hands-on opportunity to discuss and practice simple techniques that faculty can use to uncover student ideas in classroom settings. Modern conceptual change theory suggests that students will only be able to adopt scientific models if previously held ideas are challenged and found lacking. Unfortunately, challenging student ideas is difficult in many sciences, particularly where phenomena, such as geologic time or DNA, are not directly observable. Most instruction at the college level, whether lecture or inquiry-based, is focused on conveying scientific models to students. However, this workshop suggests that students should be encouraged to openly discuss or share pre-existing ideas prior to exposure to more scientific concepts. This sharing of ideas allows 1) students to recognize disparities between previous experiences or instruction and ongoing instruction; and 2) faculty to recognize the broad range of ideas that students bring to any classroom encounter. Personal experiences with college level Introduction to Geology courses will be used to exemplify techniques for collecting and using student ideas, and participants will be encouraged to practice these techniques during the workshop.

Donald B. Young
Curriculum Research & Development Group
University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI

This workshop will engage participants in an introductory sequence of investigations from the first course in the FAST sequence, The Local Environment. The sequence exemplifies the FAST approach to inquiry in which students describe phenomena, generate hypotheses and data, seek patterns and relationships, and create generalizations. Co-presented by a FAST developer and an experienced FAST teacher and certified trainer.

Jen Tyne, Paula Drewniany and Sue McGarry
Department of Mathematics and Statistics,
The University of Maine, Orono, ME
Location: 205 Little Hall

The Math Department at the University of Maine began implementing Peer Led Team Learning (PLTL) in two sections of MAT126 (Calculus I) in Spring 2004. The PLTL Workshop model provides an active learning experience for students by engaging teams of eight to ten students in challenging calculus workshops, guided by a peer leader. This two-hour presentation will cover the challenges and rewards of our efforts. We will discuss our PLTL program, present some of our developed workshops, and highlight some of our evaluation results. Participants, guided by a leader, will also experience first-hand one of our workshops.

Rosemary R. Haggett
National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA
Location: 137 Bennett Hall

You have a good idea for a science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education proposal, but most proposals start with a good idea. How do you go beyond a good idea? What can you do to maximize the likelihood that your proposal will be funded? This "working" workshop will focus on areas for enhancing a proposal that contains a good idea. Engaging in team activities, workshop participants will identify, consider and discuss ideas about how to write a more effective proposal. Topics to be considered include: framing the objective to broaden its impact, relating the idea to a larger context, developing an effective evaluation plan, and designing active, aggressive dissemination strategies. After the