Skip Navigation
Return to Layout View | Home | A-Z Directory | my UMaine | MaineStreet | Campus Map | Calendar | Apply | Give Now | Emergency
Follow UMaine on Twitter | Join UMaine on Facebook | Watch UMaine on YouTube | Admissions | Parents & Family |

Education and Human Development


Site Navigation:


Professionals - Reading Recovery


Reading Recovery is a highly effective short-term school-based intervention of one-to-one tutoring for the lowest literacy achievers in Grade 1. The goal is to dramatically reduce the number of first graders who have extreme difficulty learning to read and write and reduce the cost of these learners to education and society. Emphasis is on prevention of literacy failure, thus providing educational opportunity and access to the collected knowledge and creativity of our culture.

Developed by New Zealand psychologist Marie Clay and tested in research projects beginning in the late 1970s, the design of Reading Recovery is consistent with a large body of research on how children learn to read and write. Reading Recovery now operates internationally and is also available in Spanish in the United States and in French in Canada. 

Reading Recovery supplements classroom teaching. Individual students receive daily half-hour lessons for 12 to 20 weeks with a specially trained teacher. About 75% meet grade-level expectations and demonstrate that they can continue to learn in their classrooms. Reading Recovery’s results are rooted in its yearlong teachertraining and ongoing professional development. 

Reliance on Professional Literature and Applied Practice

Marie Clay relied on research in many related fields of literacy learning. Patterns of change (theoretical and procedural) are evident in the evolving editions of Reading Recovery’s central document for teachers. Ongoing research by Clay and others offer theoretical and practical support for the intervention. Reported outcomes for every child served validate the applied practice of the intervention.

Innovation

The USDE selected Reading Recovery for funding under their Investing in Innovation (i3) program. The i3 scale-up grants are only awarded to innovations “with the strongest evidence and track record of success.” 

Reading Recovery has brought many innovations to literacy education:

Replicability

Transported from New Zealand, Reading Recovery has been replicated in thousands of education systems across Australia, the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Summary data are reported annually in the United States by the International Data Evaluation Center (IDEC). 

Reading Recovery has a process for fidelity of implementation that ensures replicability and scalability:

Sustainability

Reading Recovery has grown internationally since its beginning in New Zealand. Introduced in the United States in 1984 at The Ohio State University, Reading Recovery has served more than two million first graders. Although sometimes limited due to budget constraints, Reading Recovery continues to serve children (53,170 in 2011-2012). 

Measurement Methods

An Observation Survey of Early Literacy Achievement (Clay, 2005) is used as a pre- and post-test assessment for Reading Recovery students and for a comparison group (random sample of class peers). The six tasks, developed in research studies with established reliability and validity, identify children at risk for literacy failure. Additional outcome data for every child and implementation process data are submitted on the secure IDEC website.

Measurable Impact

Reading Recovery has been examined by experimental and quasi-experimental studies, evaluation studies, research reviews, and meta-analyses. The USDE’s What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) established that Reading Recovery is an effective intervention based on scientific research. A federal i3 scale-up grant was awarded to Reading Recovery because this evidence showed a substantial effect on improving student achievement.

WWC findings are supported by almost 30 years of evaluation data. Approximately 75% of the lowest-performing students with a full intervention reach grade-level expectations. For students still having some difficulty (about 25%), recommendations for future support are also a positive outcome for children.

Reading Recovery’s compelling research base  also demonstrates effectiveness in reducing achievement gaps for low SES students, racial minorities, and English language learners; improving self-esteem; and promoting phonological awareness.

Reading Recovery’s wider impact includes:

Reading Recovery professionals and partners strive to open doors to a literate future for children who initially struggle in learning to read and write. Only then can these children access the collective knowledge and creativity of our culture.


Reading Recovery

http://readingrecovery.org/reading-recovery/teaching-children/basic-facts

Reduce the cost

http://readingrecovery.org/images/pdfs/Reading_Recovery/Research_and_Evaluation/long_term_costs_of_literacy_difficulties_2nd_edition_2009.pdf

Marie Clay

 http://readingrecovery.org/reading-recovery/teaching-children/marie-clay

How children learn to read and write

http://readingrecovery.org/reading-recovery/teaching-children/early-literacy-learning

Internationally

http://readingrecovery.org/reading-recovery/training/international-connections

Spanish

http://readingrecovery.org/reading-recovery/teaching-children/descubriendo-la-lectura

French

 http://readingrecovery.org/reading-recovery/training/canadian-network

Daily half-hour lessons

 http://readingrecovery.org/reading-recovery/teaching-children/lessons

Specially trained teacher

 http://readingrecovery.org/reading-recovery/training/for-teachers

75% meet grade-level expectations

http://readingrecovery.org/reading-recovery/training/for-teachers

Ongoing professional development

http://readingrecovery.org/reading-recovery/training/ongoing-training

Marie clay relied on research

http://readingrecovery.org/reading-recovery/teaching-children/marie-clay/jrr-tribute-to-marie-clay

Reported outcomes for every child

https://www.idecweb.us/

Investing in Innovation

http://www.i3.readingrecovery.info/

I3 scale up grants

http://readingrecovery.org/reading-recovery/implementation/funding/i3-scale-up-grant-funding

Prevention rather than remediation

http://readingrecovery.org/images/pdfs/Membership/Futures_Chapter_11.pdf

Exemplary professional development model

http://readingrecovery.org/reading-recovery/training

Accelerated learning for the lowest achievers

https://readingrecovery.org/images/pdfs/Journals/JRR/Vol2_No1_Fall-2002/JRR_2.1-Jones.pdf

Accountability model

http://readingrecovery.org/reading-recovery/research

Network of support

 http://readingrecovery.org/reading-recovery/training/training-centers

Replicated in thousands of education systems

http://readingrecovery.org/images/pdfs/Journals/JRR/Vol7_No1_Fall-2007/JRR_7.1-Clay.pdf

Summary data are reported annually

https://www.idecweb.us/Documentation.asp

Published set of standards & guidelines

http://readingrecovery.org/reading-recovery/implementation/standards-a-guidelines

Royalty free trademark license

http://readingrecovery.org/rrcna/about-rrcna/logo-requests

Intensive year-long university-based training, ongoing professional development and university oversight

http://readingrecovery.org/reading-recovery/training

Annual evaluation of outcomes for every child

https://www.idecweb.us/

Has grown internationally

http://readingrecovery.org/reading-recovery/training/international-connections

Continues to serve children

https://www.idecweb.us/WebDocs/DocumentationTree/Evaluation%20Reports/2011-2012%20Reading%20Recovery%20National%20Statistical%20Abstract%20for%20the%20United%20States.pdf

An Observation Survey of Early Literacy Achievement

http://readingrecovery.org/reading-recovery/teaching-children/observation-survey

Identify children at risk

http://www.rti4success.org/screeningTools

Additional outcome data for every child

https://www.idecweb.us/Documentation.asp

What Works Clearinghouse

http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/interventionreport.aspx?sid=420

A federal i3 scale-up grant

http://www2.ed.gov/programs/innovation/2010/awards/scale-up/oh.html

30 years of evaluation data

http://readingrecovery.org/reading-recovery/research/data-evaluation-idec

Positive outcome

http://readingrecovery.org/reading-recovery/research/measuring-outcomes

Reading Recovery’s compelling research base

http://readingrecovery.org/reading-recovery/research

Early identification of difficulties and early intervention

http://readingrecovery.org/images/pdfs/Journals/JRR/Vol10_No1_Fall-2010/JRR_10.1_Vellutino.pdf

Assessment appropriate for beginning literacy learners

http://readingrecovery.org/reading-recovery/teaching-children/observation-survey

Theoretical influences on teaching and learning

http://readingrecovery.org/reading-recovery/teaching-children/early-literacy-learning

Differentiated instruction through one-to-one teaching

http://readingrecovery.org/images/pdfs/Journals/JRR/Vol4_No1_Fall-2004/JRR_4.1-Askew_Simpson.pdf

Organized system for change

 http://readingrecovery.org/images/pdfs/Journals/JRR/Vol7_No1_Fall-2007/JRR_7.1-Wilson-Barsky.pdf

Back to Professionals


Sidebar

National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education

Contact Information

Education and Human Development
5766 Shibles Hall
Orono, ME 04469
Phone: (207) 581-2412
The University of Maine
Orono, Maine 04469
207.581.1110
A Member of the University of Maine System