Linda L. Garrison-Tikofsky, DVM
Quality Milk Production Services (QMPS), Cornell
University
Priority: What are the management strategies and
costs of transition or conversion of row crops to productive and sustainable
grazing lands and soils?
Priority: Evaluate the production and management
aspects of pasture-based animal products for their human health benefits and
assess their market potential.
What work are you (or
others) doing to address this research need?
QMPS
is beginning a three year study of herds transitioning from conventional
dairying methods and inputs to organic production. We plan to have five
participating herds and currently have three enrolled. Goals of this study are two-fold:
a.
To describe
the impact of transitioning to organic methods on milk quality (somatic cell
counts, bacteria counts components), production, udder health epidemiology,
food borne pathogens, antibiotic resistance, and value added potential of milk
as a functional food (e.g. conjugated linoleic acid). All participating farms will begin with common conventional management systems (lower forage rations, dry
cow and lactating antibiotic therapy, other conventional health
practices).
b.
We will use
participatory methods to engage the producers and to develop management
strategies as problems as and issues arise and ultimately will develop a
management guide for future farms in transition.
An
additional current yearlong project will look compare CLAs, Vitamin A and E,
beta-carotene, and milk quality parameters among three management systems
(organic, conventional grazing, and conventional confinement). We are enrolling 10 organic farms and 5 each
of the other two management systems for a total of 20 farms.
Given the expected results
from the work described in response to question 1, what future research (and/or
extension) needs remain?
Given your knowledge of
existing research capacity, what additional resources (funding personnel,
institutional strengthening, etc.) may be needed to accomplish future research?
I
am in agreement with Nat that we need to have committed sources of primary
funding that are not from for-profit companies. Having said that, I think there are companies out there that have
a genuine interest in supporting sustainable agriculture so refusing their
support would deprive us of valuable dollars.
This private sector funding should be secondary but still be considered.
Given
the limited number of dollars available for research and extension in this
area, more efforts should be directed at developing cooperative relationships
among institutions so that there is not a duplication of efforts. I would like to see an annual cooperative
meeting where research can be discussed, research priorities set, and
collaborations among the participating institutions can be encouraged in an
open forum.
How
do we set up lines of communication among the groups?