Presidential Public Service Achievement Award
Since 1982, in recognition of the mission of public service at the University of Maine, the President has annually presented the Presidential Public Service Achievement Award to an individual University of Maine faculty or professional staff member in a teaching, research, and/or public service unit who has demonstrated distinguished achievement in public service.
Public Service is the application of the special knowledge and skills associated with one’s professional life at the University of Maine to enhance the public good, whether through public education, direct assistance in specific situations, or long-term commitment towards achieving particular public service goals. Hence, the definition excludes some forms of “community service,” such as serving as a scout leader or participating in other service activities that do not necessarily require one’s professional expertise or specialized knowledge of the University. However, this definition is meant to include service that advances the effectiveness of or contributes to the mission of the University even if it doesn’t require the discipline-specific expertise of the nominee.
For more information, please visit: www.umaine.edu/provost/recognitions.html
Dossier Requirements:
- Name, title of nominee, and date of submission. [Must be a full-time, regular faculty member of UMaine.]
- Statement of Justification: A statement should be prepared justifying why the President of the University of Maine should give special recognition to this individual for distinguished public service achievement. The purpose of this statement is to convince the Presidential Public Service Award Committee that the candidate has accomplished results, which are highly significant and clearly warrant recognition.
- You may use your letter of nomination for this statement, if you feel that it is sufficient for this purpose.
- Description of the Nominee’s Accomplishments
- Description of the accomplishment(s) should address the following:
- 1. What did the nominee do?
- 2. Who benefited from the service? Was the impact of the contribution(s) local, regional, national, or international in scope?
- 3. How were the contribution(s) made? Did the effort involved in the intervention(s) require exceptional creativity; development of new methods or techniques; overcoming major obstacles; performance above and beyond regular job responsibilities?
- 4. What was the impact of the accomplishment(s)?
- Supportive Documents:
- 1. Curriculum Vitae
- 2. At least three (3) letters of reference attesting to the quality and significance of the nominee’s intervention(s).
NOTE: In describing the accomplishment(s) please avoid in-house terminology and technical jargon. Be specific and, if possible, provide qualitative/quantitative information that might help evaluate the significance and the scope of the contribution(s). Although there are no length limitations to this section of the dossier, submission of a short abstract summarizing the accomplishments of the nominee is encouraged if this section is more than several pages in length.
2010 Paul A. Mayewski
2009 Kathryn Olmstead
2008 Alan Cobo-Lewis
2007 Herbert Crosby
2006 Carol Gilmore
2005 David Lambert
2004 Todd M. Gabe
2003 Harlan Onsrud
2002 Sandra L. Caron
2001 Ann Schonberger
2000 Walter G. McIntire
1999 George Jacobson, Jr.
1998 Dana N. Humphrey
1997 Sheila J. Pechinski
1996 Alfred A. Bushway
1995 James H. Breece
1994 Ray B. Owen
1993 Edward 'Sandy' Ives
1992 Lucille A. Zeph
1991 William H. Whitaker
1990 Herbert Hidu
1989 David F. Wihry
1988 Robert C. Bayer
1987 James A. Wilson
1986 Vaughn H. Holyoke
1985 Barbara A. Barton
1984 Richard J. Campana
1983 Patricia M. Pierson
1982 Richard C. Hill
