Some Developmental Issues in Transpersonal Experience
Harry T. Hunt, Brock University
The Journal of Mind and Behavior , Spring 1995, Volume 16, Number 2, Pages
115-134, ISSN 0271-0137
Developmental understanding of transpersonal experience and its diverse impact on
human life has been bedeviled by the opposed, monolithic extremes of Freud's regression
to infant "narcissism," on the one hand, and more recent views of the transpersonal
as the sole endpoint for any "higher" or "postformal operations"
development of human intelligence, on the other. Here it is shown that "higher
states of consciousness" can be more specifically understood as developments
of a "presentational" intelli-gence, thereby constituting one line of adult
development among the several open to our symbolic capacity. The demonstrated but
relatively infrequent occurrence of transpersonal states in early childhood then
becomes understandable as a developmental precocity akin to that shown in mathematical
and musical prodigies. The overlap of this developmental line with some of the thematics
and regressive states of psychoanalytic object relations theories of infancy follows
from the experiential nature of pre-sentational intelligence. Early emotional traumata
and deficits must reappear in transpersonal experience to the extent that they were
internalized as part of the mother-infant dyad whose structure underlies our symbolic,
dialogic consciousness.
Requests for reprints should be sent to Harry T. Hunt, Ph.D., Department of Psychology,
Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada L2S 3A1
Monistic Idealism May Provide Better Ontology
for Cognitive Science: A Reply to Dyer
Amit Goswami, University of Oregon, Eugene
The Journal of Mind and Behavior , Spring 1995, Volume 16, Number 2, Pages
135-150, ISSN 0271-0137
This is a response to Michael Dyer's (1994) Commentary on Goswami's Quantum-Based
Theory of Consciousness and Free Will, a theory that I will call idealist science
- a science based on the primacy of consciousness rather than matter. First, I review
Dyer's main points: (1) there is no need for idealist science since cognitive science
can explain whatever human phenomena idealist science purports to explain; and (2)
idealist science offers nothing new, such as, new methodology or experimental prediction.
I then review some of the inadequacies of the cognitive science model of consciousness
stemming in part from its impoverished ontology of physical realism. It is shown
that cognitive science follows from the new idealist science (as classical physics
follows from quantum physics) in the limit of a correspondence principle. In this
way, idealist science is seen to support cognitive science (rather than replace it)
while generalizing the scope of science itself to include the subjective aspects
of reality. Next, I point out what idealist science gains for us: (1) treatment within
science of the subjective aspects of creativity, ethics, free will, and spirituality
(without the need to explain these away as epiphenomena); and (2) integration of
all the forces of psychology, and also of physics and biology. Finally, I discuss
possible experiments to distinguish between realist and idealist models of reality.
Requests for reprints should be sent to Amit Goswami, Ph.D., Department of Physics
and the Institute of Theoretical Science, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403
On the Quantum Mechanical Wave Function as a
Link Between Cognition and the Physical World: A Role for Psychology
Douglas M. Snyder, Los Angeles, California
The Journal of Mind and Behavior , Spring 1995, Volume 16, Number 2, Pages
151-180, ISSN 0271-0137
A straightforward explanation of fundamental tenets concerning the quantum mechanical
wave function results in the thesis that the quantum mechanical wave function is
a link between human cognition and the physical world. The way in which physicists
have not accepted this explanation is discussed, and some of the roots of the problem
are explored. The basis for an empirical test as to whether the wave function is
a link between human cognition and the physical world is provided through developing
an experiment incorporating methodology from psychology and physics. Research in
psychology and physics that relied on this methodology indicates that it is likely
that Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen's theoretical result that mutually exclusive wave
functions can simultaneously apply to the same concrete physical circumstances can
be implemented on an empirical level.
Requests for reprints should be sent to Douglas M. Snyder, Ph.D., 459 North Spaulding
Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90036
Consciousness and Commissurotomy: VI. Evidence
for Normal Dual Consciousness?
Thomas Natsoulas, University of California, Davis
The Journal of Mind and Behavior , Spring 1995, Volume 16, Number 2, Pages
181-206, ISSN 0271-0137
This article addresses the problem of evidence for Puccetti's hypothesis of normal
dual consciousness, i.e., the hypothesis that a stream of consciousness flows in
each cerebral hemisphere when both are functioning normally in intact, healthy people.
Evidence counts as supportive only if it is not explainable by a certain close alternative
hypothesis that holds consciousness to proceed in the nondominant hemisphere only
when the dominant hemisphere is unable to inhibit it (e.g., complete commissurotomy,
dominant hemispherectomy, dominant anesthesia). From this perspective, I discuss
(a) two experiments involving anesthesia of the dominant hemisphere that were proposed,
respectively, by Wilson and Puccetti, (b) an actual experiment on normal, unanesthetized
subjects reported by Landis, Graves, and Goodglass, as well as (c) a further kind
of experiment which, I suggest, may discriminate between the hypotheses. Assuming
Puccetti is right, this experiment should yield a distinct pattern of reports from
the dominant hemisphere about its experiences of acting as the individual deals with
different kinds of tasks ("nondominant" vs. "dominant"). Also
considered is the common (negative) introspective evidence to the effect that we
have only a single stream, never two distinct experiences at the same time. I argue,
in support of Puccetti, that this is as it should be because introspection-at-a-distance
is impossible; privileged access is internal to a stream, never occurs between streams.
Requests for reprints should be sent to Thomas Natsoulas, Ph.D., Department of
Psychology, University of California, Davis, California 95616
Book Review ª Evolving Ecological Universe
Sally J. Goerner. Langhorne, Pennsylvania:Gordon and Breach, 1994
Reviewed by Larry Vandervert, American Nonlinear Systems
The Journal of Mind and Behavior , Spring 1995, Volume 16, Number 2, Pages
207-210, ISSN 0271-0137
[Note: First paragraph, no abstract available.] "This book's thesis is that
our time marks the emergence of a new world hypothesis based on the root metaphor
of an evolving ecology" (p. 4). Goerner makes a point of arguing that a world
hypothesis is like a paradigm shift (Kuhnian); only it is broader. If this book is
about anything, it is about world views. The ideas of paradigms and world views are
so fundamental to the book's thesis, broad-ranging implications, and conclusions,
they deserve a separate discussion.
Requests for reprints should be sent to Larry Vandervert, Ph.D., American Nonlinear
Systems, West 711 Waverly Place, Spokane, Washington 99205-3271
Book Review ª The Morals and Politics of
Psychology: Psychological Discourse and the Status Quo
Isaac Prilleltensky. Albany:State University of New York, 1994
Reviewed by Ken Barney, Cambridge, Massachusetts
The Journal of Mind and Behavior , Spring 1995, Volume 16, Number 2, Pages
211-214, ISSN 0271-0137
[Note: First paragraph, no abstract available.] This critical overview of psychology
calls for a radical transformation of both academic and applied psychology. The author,
Isaac Prilleltensky, joins others who criticize psychology's narrow focus and its
repression of sociopolitical dimensions - specifically, the oppressive aspects of
capitalist society, including its unrestrained individualism. In the preface to The
Morals and Politics of Psychology: Psychological Discourse and the Status Quo,
George Albee states that the book "will force its readers to reconsider the
historic, slavish, ongoing preoccupation of psychology with attempts at changing
the individual to the neglect of changing the social environment" (p. ix). The
book ranges widely over various fields within psychology, describing the pervasiveness
of the narrow focus. The author's stated intention is to advance the understanding
of "the mechanisms involved in the utilization of psychology in the maintenance
or reproduction of the prevalent social system" (p. 11). The description is
persuasive; however, the analysis suffers from certain limitations, highlighted in
this review.
Requests for reprints should be sent to Ken Barney, M.D., 3 Soden Place, Cambridge,
Massachusetts 02139