Lucid Dreaming: Physiological Correlates of Consciousness
during REM Sleep
Stephen LaBerge, Stanford University and The Saybrook Institute and Lynne Levitan
and William C. Dement, Stanford University
The Journal of Mind and Behavior , Spring and Summer 1986, Vol. 7, Numbers
2 and 3, Pages 251 [121]-258 [128], ISSN 0271-0137, ISBN 0-930195-02-7
Reports of lucid dreaming (dreaming while being conscious that one is dreaming) were
verified for 13 selected subjects who signaled by means of voluntary eye-movements
that they knew they were dreaming while continuing to dream during unequivocal REM
sleep. Physiological analysis of the resulting 76 signal-verified lucid dreams (SVLDs)
revealed that elevated levels of automatic nervous system activity reliably occured
both during and 30 seconds preceding the onset of SVLDs, implicating physiological
activation as a necessary condition for reflective consciousness during REM dreaming.
The ability of proficient lucid dreamers to deliberately perform dream actions in
accordance with presleep agreement makes possible the methodical and precise determination
of pyschophysiological correspondence during REM dreaming.
Requests for reprints should be sent to Stephen LaBerge, Ph.D., Sleep Research
Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305.
Effects of Environmental Context and Cortical
Activation on Thought
Ruth Reinsel, Miriam Wollman, and John S. Antrobus, The City College of the City
University of New York
The Journal of Mind and Behavior , Spring and Summer 1986, Vol. 7, Numbers
2 and 3, Pages 259 [129]-276 [146], ISSN 0271-0137, ISBN 0-930195-02-7
This paper describes two experiments that examine the relationship between external
auditory non-specific stimulation and disruption of the thematic sequencing of spontaneous
thought and imagery. It is proposed that such external stimulation disrupts the flow
of spontaneous mentation, resulting in more and briefer thematic sequences per unit
of time. It is assumed that the long thematic sequences of REM sleep, in contrast
to waking, are achieved, in part, because of the high perceptual thresholds of that
state, which prevent the disruption of mentation sequences by external stimuli. The
two experiments simulate the long thematic sequences of dreaming in the waking state
by comparing the disruptive effects of two levels of ambient auditory stimulation.
Requests for reprints should be sent to John Antrobus, Ph.D., Department of Psychology,
The City College of New York, New York, New York 10031.
Lucid Dreaming Frequency in Relation to Vestibular
Sensitivity as Measured by Caloric Stimulation
Jayne Gackenbach, University of Northern Iowa and Thomas J. Snyder, Iowa Area Education
Agency 6 and LeAnn M. Rokes, University of Northern Iowa and Daniel Sachau, University
of Utah
The Journal of Mind and Behavior , Spring and Summer 1986, Vol. 7, Numbers
2 and 3, Pages 277 [147]-298 [168], ISSN 0271-0137, ISBN 0-930195-02-7
Twenty-four males and 24 females with no history of vestibular dysfunction but who
differed in their reported frequency of lucid dreaming (being aware of dreaming while
the dream is in progress), underwent bithermal caloric irrigation to determine their
electronystagmographic (ENG) responsiveness and their reported vertigo, both of which
are measures of the functional integrity of the vestibular system. Evidence of a
positive association between lucid dreaming frequency and ENG responsiveness was
found for two graphic measures of nystagmus, amplitude per beat and speed in the
slow phase, and for three other measures which imply decreased vestibular sensitivity,
dysrhythmia, directional preponderance, and canal paresis. These results signify
that frequent lucid dreamers are more responsive to caloric irrigation than are persons
who never dream lucidly. Consonant differences between dreamer types were also found
for the latency and duration of self-reported vertigo. Based on these findings and
others in which lucidity frequency has been related to experiential and behavioral
differences in equilaboratory functioning, it is proposed that frequent lucid dreamers
represent a subset of people whose vestibular system is subject to intense activation
during sleep and whose dream mentation reflects this activation. It is conjectured
that studies of vestibular physiology may provide a promising path for understanding
the psychophysiology of sleep, the dream process, and self-awareness.
Requests for reprints should be sent to Jayne Gackenbach, Ph.D., Department of
Psychology, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, Iowa 50614.