Skip to main content Skip to main content
Programs Overview
Undergraduate Programs
Graduate Programs
Course Catalog
Outreach Initiatives
Research Clusters
Research Areas
Funding Opportunities
People Overview
Find a Mentor
Alumni Directory
Job Opportunities
Admissions Overview
Undergraduate Admissions
Graduate Admissions
Contact Us
Maps & Directions
Campus Tours

James (Jim) Wilson

If you need to locate a faculty member with knowledge about particular functions of SMS (e.g., graduate admissions), you can find them on the list of current faculty committees.

James (Jim) Wilson

Contact Information

James (Jim) Wilson


View Website
Download CV

203 Libby Hall
Orono, ME  04469-5741


Ph.D. Wisconsin

Research interests


My research interests, and to a large extent that of my colleagues in marine policy, can be very simply stated: "How do we build a social environment in which marine resources, especially fisheries, can be sustained?" I’ve found that the answers to that question are anything but simple and are likely to come only through an integration of the social and natural sciences and a thorough understanding of the human environment, i.e., the real people involved. As a result my own work has tended to become strongly interdisciplinary incorporating resource economics, fisheries ecology, anthropology and, lately, political science. An on-going involvement with fishermen and their associations is a deliberate part of this broad research plan. 


The thrust of this work can be best explained from a historical perspective. Economists usually approach the ‘fishery problem’ using a very simple biology designed to illustrate the problems that arise when there are no property rights attached to renewable resources. That was my first introduction to fisheries. I had a second introduction that came from fishermen - lobstermen, herring seiners, groundfish draggers, scallopers and others. A third introduction came from biologist colleagues. Unless one wants to be deliberately deaf, dumb and blind in the name of theory, it is hard to walk away from the information provided by fishermen and biologists and not be profoundly skeptical of the simple biological conceptions that tend to characterize fisheries economics and management. 


The more I saw the more skeptical I became - not of economics, per se, but of the way economics chose to characterize the fisheries environment - it wasn’t all wrong but it certainly didn’t hit the nail on the head. At first the problem seemed to be over-simplification, but later I came to realize that problem was the fundamental reliance on the presumed existence of a predictable biological (and human) system (oversimplification of a limited kind). By predictable what I mean in this context is the idea that we can know the results of our interventions in this kind of complex system. For example, fisheries managers usually feel that less catch today will lead to higher catches (on average) in the future. But I’ve seen little or no evidence that we know how a species or part of the system will respond to our actions (except in extreme cases such as no fish versus some fish). 


The intellectual problem this kind of skepticism poses is "how can we or should we manage our fisheries resources when we can’t predict the results of our own interventions?" The problem is not simply a lack of knowledge of the variability of the components in the system (whose solution can be approached with normal statistical investigative procedures), it is the more difficult problem of not knowing the dynamics of the system - either because we don’t understand the underlying ‘model’ or because the system is chaotic. 


The strong implication is that the problem does not have a technical solution; but this does not mean it has no solution. The solution, I believe, lies in governance - that is, rather than managing resources we have to start thinking about how we govern our own behavior with regard to those resources. 


Here in Maine we have started down the road of working out practical fisheries governance systems. We’ve started with the lobster fishery which has been divided into seven zones; each zone has a council elected by licensed fishermen from that zone. Each zone has control over rules whose primary impact is at the local level - internalizing costs and benefits in the jargon of economics. At the State-wide level there is a council of councils that has control of rules whose impacts extend beyond a single zone. The point of this governance system is to allow us to address ecological and human events at multiple scales and to do that in a way that builds stewardship incentives in individual fishermen and communities. As we gain experience in the lobster fishery the intention is to extend this system or modifications of it, to the rest of the State’s fisheries. Down the road, perhaps not too far, is the adaptation of this approach to other environmental problems such as watershed and coastal zone management.



  • National Research Council
    James Wilson, 2002. Scientific Uncertainty, Complex Systems and the Design of Common Pool Institutions, in the Drama of the Commons. Eds. Paul Stern, Elinor Ostrom, Thomas Dietz, and Nives Dolsak. National Research Council, Committee on Human Dimensions of Global Climate Change.
  • Navigating Nature's Dynamics
    Bobbi Low, E. Ostrom, C. Simon and J. Wilson. 2002. Redundancy in Social and Ecological Systems. In Navigating Nature's Dynamics: Building Resilience for Adaptive Capacity in Social-Ecological Systems. Berkes, F., Colding, J. and Folke, C. (editors), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Finding Our Sea Legs
    Ted Ames, S. Watson and J. Wilson. 2001. Rethinking Overfishing; in Finding Our Sea Legs: Linking Fishery People and Their Knowledge with Science and Management. Neis, Barbara and Lawrence Felt, Contributing eds. St. John's: ISER Press.
  • Institutions, Ecology and Sustainability
    Robert Costanza, B. Low. E. Ostrom and J. Wilson, eds. 2001. Institutions, Ecology and Sustainability, CRC Press. Boca Raton/London
  • Simulating the market for lobster
    James Wilson, 2001. Simulation of the market for Maine lobster. In Institutions, Ecology and Sustainability, CRC Press. Pp. 151-168.
  • Ecological Economics
    James Wilson, E. Ostrom, B. Low, and R. Costanza, 2000. Scale misperceptions: and the spatial dynamics of a social-ecological system, Ecological Economics, Vol. 31, pp.243-57.
  • Action Coalition for the Gulf of Maine
    Wilson, James. 2000. How do we know what is the right thing to do? Gulf Of Maine Rockweed: Management in the face of scientific uncertainty. Proceedings of the Global Programme of Action Coalition for the Gulf of Maine (GPAC) workshop. Huntsman Marine Science Centre, St. Andrews, New Brunswick, December 5-7, 1999. R.W. Rangeley and J. L. Davies (Editors).
  • TemaNord
    James Wilson, The Maine fisheries management initiative, 1997. In The Social Impacts of Individual Transferable Quotas, ed. Gisli Palsson, TemaNord, Copenhagen, pp. 335-353.
  • Marine Policy
    James Wilson, Peter Kleban, James Acheson and Mark Metcalfe, 1994. Chaos, Complexity and Community Management of Fisheries, with James Acheson, Peter Kleban and Mark Metcalfe , in Marine Policy, Vol.18(4), pp. 291-305.
  • Ecological Modeling
    James Wilson, Susan McKay, Peter Kleban, John French and Ralph Townsend, 1991. Chaotic Dynamics in a Multiple Species Fishery: A Model of Community Predation, Ecological Modeling , Vol. 58, pp. 303-321.
  • Land Economics
    James Wilson, 1990. Fishing for Knowledge, Land Economics, Vol. 66(1), pp. 12-29.

Are you James (Jim) Wilson? If so, log in to edit your profile.

Marine Science

Copyright © 2016 UMaine School of Marine Sciences

Website built by RainStorm Consulting