Poverty in Maine - 2006
Executive Summary

This report presents a statewide and county-by-county picture of poverty in Maine in 2006. In 2005-2006, the Maine Community Action Association contracted with the Margaret Chase Smith Policy Center at the University of Maine to update and expand our earlier report, Poverty in Maine: 2003, which also was produced with funding from the Maine Community Action Association. The intent is to build upon the Maine State Planning Office’s "Annual Report Card on Poverty in Maine," to provide a more detailed examination of poverty at the county and local levels. Information is based on datasets from: the food stamp program administered by the Maine Department of Health and Human Services; the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) administered by the Maine State Housing Authority (MSHA) through the community action agencies; the free and reduced school lunch program administered by the Maine Department of Education; unemployment data from the Maine Department of Labor; updated U.S. Census information on poverty, income, and population; the federal Bureau of Economic Analysis Regional Economic Information System (REIS); and information developed by the Maine Center for Economic Policy (MECEP) regarding livable wages in Maine. The indicators are a subset of standard ones used in the United States in evaluating the extent of poverty, assessing needs, and measuring services and benefits aimed at low-income populations. The report includes a statewide and county-by-county view of selected indicators and of trends since the 2003 report, as well as individual "poverty profiles" and trends for each county.

Poverty and Demography

  • Maine’s estimated individual poverty rate in 2003 was 10.7%, almost two percentage points lower than the national average.

  • Highest rates of poverty in 2003 were in Washington County (16.1%), followed by Aroostook and Somerset counties (14.3%). Lowest poverty rates were in York and Sagadahoc counties (8.3%) and in Cumberland County (8.4%). During the four years since the decennial Census (2000-2003), the poverty rate in Maine rose between 2000 and 2002. Though it declined slightly in 2003, it remained higher than in 2000. The poverty rate trend in most counties mirrored that of the state as a whole, with the exception of Oxford, Piscataquis, and Washington counties where the rate in 2003 was lower than in 2000. Cumberland was the only county in which the poverty rate rose each year between 2000 and 2003.

  • Census estimates (2005) indicate that counties with the highest proportion of the population who are working-age (18-64) are Franklin, Penobscot, and Cumberland. Lincoln, Washington, Piscataquis, and Aroostook counties have a higher proportion of elders than other counties. Sagadahoc and Androscoggin counties have the highest proportion of the population in the under-18 age group of any county.

  • The level of educational attainment is one of the most important population characteristics affecting economic well-being. In the
    2000 Census 69.3% of Maine’s population reported lacking a college degree (associate
    or higher), compared with 61.3% in the other New England states and 69.3% nationally. In Somerset, Piscataquis, and Washington counties, close to 80% of the population lacks a college degree.

Income

  • Maine’s median household income (2003 Census estimate) is below the national average, and Maine is in the lower tier of states in that measure. There continues to be a wide range of income across Maine’s counties. Aroostook, Piscataquis, and Washington counties had median household incomes close to or more than 20% below the state level of $39,212 in 2003, and Cumberland and York counties had median household incomes about 20% above that level.

  • The Bureau of Economic Analysis measure of personal income includes both cash and non-cash income: net earnings; income from investments; and income from government transfer payments (e.g., Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security, food stamps). In Maine, earnings account for a smaller proportion of total personal income than in the nation as a whole, while income from transfer payments and investments is a higher proportion, due in part to Maine’s older population. Transfer payments accounted for 19% of personal income in the state in 2004, but were close to or greater than one-quarter of personal income in Washington, Aroostook, Piscataquis, Somerset, and Oxford counties.

  • A "livable wage" is the level estimated for a household to maintain a basic needs budget and be self-sufficient from any benefits or assistance. The level varies depending both on household size and characteristics and on regional differences in cost of living, particularly housing and child care costs. There is a gap between poverty levels and a basic needs budget (livable wage) in all of Maine’s counties and metropolitan areas. Counties in the state with higher median incomes and lower poverty rates, such as Cumberland and York, also have higher living costs, but a smaller proportion of the population is eligible for benefits which are based on federal poverty guidelines.

Employment

  • Maine’s monthly average unemployment rate of 4.8% in 2005 was lower than the national average of 5.1%. Cumberland, Knox, Lincoln, Sagadahoc and York counties had unemployment rates lower than the state average. Aroostook, Piscataquis, Somerset and Washington counties had unemployment rates considerably above the state average; Washington County’s rate of 8.4% was the highest in the state.

  • In the period from 2002 to 2005, the year 2003 had the highest unemployment rate in both Maine and in the nation. Unlike the nation’s, Maine’s unemployment rate was higher in 2005 than in 2002. Even though Maine’s unemployment rate remains below the national rate, the gap has narrowed since 2002, a possible indicator that Maine has lagged behind the national economic recovery during this time period.

Benefits and Assistance

  • Statewide in FY2004-05, 15.7% of all households and 12.3% of the population received food stamps. Household participation rates in the food stamp program ranged from less than 10% in Hancock County, to more than 20% in Washington, Somerset, Aroostook, and Androscoggin counties. Somerset and Washington counties each had over 19% of their population receiving food stamps, while in Hancock, Sagadahoc, and York counties, less than 9% of the population were food stamp recipients.

  • From FY2002 to FY2005, the number of Maine households receiving food stamps increased by almost 50%; food stamp use also increased nationally, by 26% from 2000 to 2004. In Maine, several federal and state policy and procedure changes played a part in this increase. All counties had increases in food stamp use, ranging from 25% in Aroostook County, to more than 60% in Hancock and Knox counties.

  • In FY2004-05, 8.8% of all households statewide participated in the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP). Household participation rates ranged from a low of 3.4% in Cumberland County to more than 18% in Franklin, Washington, and Aroostook counties. In Aroostook, Franklin and Washington counties, more than one-quarter of all elderly households received LIHEAP benefits in FY2004-05.

  • More than one-third of school children statewide in FY2005-06 were eligible for the free and reduced school lunch program. In Washington, Piscataquis and Somerset counties, close to half were eligible. From FY2003 to FY2006, the proportion of students eligible for free and reduced school lunch increased each year statewide and in most counties.

Previous: Title Page

Table of Contents Next: Introduction

Home     About Us     Research Units     Maine Policy Review     Conferences & Events     Student Opportunities     Related Links

   
Margaret Chase Smith Policy Center

The University of Maine, 5784 York Complex #4, Orono, ME 04469-5784
    Phone: (207) 581-1648          Fax: (207) 581-1266          mcsc@umit.maine.edu

A Member of the University of Maine System
http://www.umaine.edu