|
The Manager Plan in Maine
Chapter II: The Structure of the
Maine Manager Plan
The
Structure of the Maine Manager Plan
The Maine manager plan might be described
as the channeling of direction and control over municipal administration through a single
administrator appointed by and responsible to a small municipal legislative and/or
executive body elected on a non-partisan basis. Over the last 70 years the manager plan
has been applied extensively in Maine cities, towns, plantations and villages. (A
plantation is a unit of general municipal government unique to Maine. Under general law,
plantations have annual meetings and a somewhat simpler governmental organization than
towns, but plantations are not accorded the broad home rule and ordinance powers of towns
and cities). Today, nearly half of Maine's 490 municipal units operate under the manager
plan or some variation of the manager plan.
The Maine manager plan can be classified
into five general categories. The distinction between the categories is based upon the
type of power available to the elected body to which the manager is directly responsible.
These categories are: the council-manager form, the town meeting-council-manager form, the
town meeting-selectmen-manager form, the mayor-council-administrator form, and the town
meeting-selectmen-administrative assistant form. While technically an administrative
structure within the town meeting-selectmen form of government, the administrative
assistant category typically has not been considered a part of the manager plan. However,
it does represent the administrative structure of a growing segment of municipalities
within the state. A brief description of each form of government is as follows.
1.
Council-Manager: All municipal legislative and policy determining powers are
unified in a small elected council. The council hires a professional manager to carry out
its policy and to direct administration. The manager is vested with administrative
authority to appoint and supervise personnel, to prepare and administer the budget and to
make recommendations and reports to the council. Ultimate responsibility for policy and
administration, however, resides with the council. This form parallels the national model
which also has numerous hybrids.
2. Town
Meeting-Council-Manager: General legislative powers and policy-making authority
are vested in a small elected council. Other such powers are retained by the town meeting.
The manager is responsible to the council for town administration, and is accorded some
degree of supervisory, appointment and budgetary authority. Under this form the council
has less legislative and policy-making flexibility than does the council-manager council
form of government.
3. Town
Meeting-Selectmen-Manager: The town meeting is vested with general legislative
and policy determining powers, while the board of selectmen under law may enact certain
ordinances regulating vehicles and public ways, and under the authorization of town
meetings may amend certain zoning ordinances (M.R.S.A., Sections 2151 (3) C and 4953 (3)).
The elected board of selectmen is the executive body of the town. It retains ultimate
responsibility for administration but hires a manager to carry out and oversee day-to-day
operations. The extent and scope of managerial administrative authority varies. Since the
town meeting is constituted only occasionally, the board of selectmen may exercise some
discretion in interpreting town meeting policy between town meetings.
4.
Mayor-Council-Administrator: Typically, these are variations on the
mayor-council form of government with an elected mayor acting as chief administrative
officer of the municipality and a full-time administrator working directly under the
mayor.
5. Town
Meeting-Selectmen-Administrative Assistant: Under the administrative assistant
form of government, the town meeting is vested with general legislative and policy
determining powers and final administrative authority rests with the board of selectmen
unless superseded by local charter. The administrative assistant works directly for the
board, although in many cases performing the same duties as a town manager.
The table shows the number of Maine
municipalities within each form of government category, by selected population groups.
Manager plan municipalities are defined as the Council-Manager, Town
Meeting-Council-Manager, and the Town Meeting-Selectmen-Manager forms described above. As
shown in the table, just over one-third of all Maine municipalities operate under the
manager plan. Taking into consideration towns employing administrative assistants, nearly
one-half of all Maine municipalities operate with some form of the municipal
administrator.
Table 2
Forms
of Maine Local Government with An Appointed Administrator
by Population Group*
1990 Population Groups |
Council-
Manager
N | % |
Town Meeting-
Council-
Manager
N | % |
Town Meeting-
Selectman-
Manager
N | % |
Council-Mayor-
Administrator
N | % |
Town Meeting-
Selectmen-
Adm. Assistant
N | % |
Total |
| 0-100 |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
1 |
2.4 |
1 |
| 101-500 |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
13 |
9.8 |
0 |
- |
6 |
14.6 |
19 |
| 501-1,000 |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
22 |
16.7 |
0 |
- |
12 |
29.3 |
34 |
| 1,001-2,000 |
1 |
2.5 |
4 |
23.5 |
40 |
30.3 |
0 |
- |
14 |
34.3 |
59 |
| 2,001-3,000 |
1 |
2.5 |
4 |
23.5 |
26 |
19.7 |
0 |
- |
6 |
14.6 |
37 |
| 3,001-4,000 |
1 |
2.5 |
0 |
- |
11 |
8.3 |
0 |
- |
1 |
2.4 |
13 |
| 4,001-5,000 |
6 |
15.0 |
4 |
23.5 |
8 |
6.1 |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
18 |
| 5,001-10,000 |
18 |
45.0 |
5 |
29.5 |
11 |
8.3 |
0 |
- |
1 |
2.4 |
35 |
| 10,000-20,000 |
7 |
17.5 |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
4 |
100.0 |
0 |
- |
11 |
| 20,001-30,000 |
3 |
7.5 |
0 |
- |
1 |
0.8 |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
4 |
| 30,000-over |
3 |
7.5 |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
3 |
| Total |
40 |
100.0 |
17 |
100.0 |
132 |
100.0 |
4 |
100.0 |
41 |
100.0 |
234 |
* As reported by
local government officials, 1991.
top
Return to Manager Plan Table of Contents
The
Council-Manager Form
The council-manager form of government is
used in 40 Maine municipalities and represents one-fifth of all manager plan
municipalities. This form of government is found most often in municipalities with
populations above 5,000, with no municipalities below 1,000 population operating under
this form of government. These council-manager governments may deviate from the national
model in several respects. One-third of the municipal councils in Maine are oriented to
district rather than at large representation.
Five council-manager municipalities elect
a mayor at-large. Under this system, the elected mayor is presiding officer and ceremonial
head of government. The mayor may vote only if there is a tie, and has no administrative
duties. The exception to this is Gardiner, in which the mayor appoints certain officers
with the consent of council. It is noted that a separately elected mayor, who has an
at-large or city-wide constituency, may be more likely to be involved in purely
administrative matters than a mayor elected by and from the council.
Most Maine council-manager charters
designate the manager as administrative head of government responsible to the council for
the administration of all departments. While the manager is generally accorded broad
responsibility for direction and control of administration, some charters have placed
limitations on the manager's authority.
One indicator of managerial authority is
the extent to which the manager has broad power to appoint and dismiss subordinates.
Council appointment of municipal officers has been rather widespread in Maine. In over
half of the council-manager municipalities, the council appoints three or more municipal
officials in addition to the manager. Most frequently, these council appointed officials
are: clerks, solicitors, tax collectors, treasurers, and assessors. In some municipalities
all key financial officers are appointed by the council, which is an apparent limitation
on the manager's financial direction and control capability. A few public safety officials
such as health officers, police chiefs and fire chiefs are appointed by the council. In
addition, there are instances where various boards and commissions, some of which may have
administrative functions, are appointed by council. In a majority of Maine council-manager
municipalities, the manager is precluded from appointing or dismissing certain municipal
operating officials, who are in theory subordinates.
In fact, only a few municipal charters
provide that the manager has the sole power to appoint other department heads and
employees. Many charters require that the council confirm managerial appointments. Some
have argued that this practice compromises the manager's administrative responsibility to
the council, because the manager may have to appoint on the basis of council consensus
rather than on the basis of administrative competence. The practice is thus a shared
responsibility and becomes even more significant, however, when a manager has need to
dismiss or demote an employee. Unless the manager's authority to dismiss or demote is
spelled out clearly in a charter or in an ordinance, council confirmation of such actions
may be necessary and could involve political ramifications.
top
Return to Manager Plan Table of Contents
The
Town Meeting-Council-Manager Form
Several Maine municipalities have the town
meeting-council-manager form. It is used by municipalities with populations between 1,000
and 10,000. Approximately 40 percent of municipalities with the town
meeting-council-manager form have adopted this form of government since 1970.
Essentially, the Maine town
meeting-council-manager charter provides for a sharing or a division of the legislative
powers of the municipality between the town meeting and the council. The exact delegation
of powers differs from one municipality to another. In some municipalities, the municipal
legislative powers may be shared by the town meeting and council. Generally, all
legislative powers not specifically delegated by the charter to the council and all other
residual powers of the municipality remain vested in the town meeting. In other
municipalities, the town meeting is retained for the primary purpose of approving and
adopting the annual town budget with all other legislative and residual powers of the town
vested in the elected town council.
This latter variation of the town
meeting-council-manager form also was used in Falmouth, Gorham, Kittery and Old Orchard
Beach to reduce the need for frequent town meetings and to facilitate policy-making
through a small council vested with broad powers. These four towns, however, have since
voted to discontinue the town meeting and to transfer the budget adoption function to the
council, thereby converting to the council-manager form.
The Maine town meeting-council-manager
form features a small council of either five or seven members that is elected at-large and
on a non-partisan basis. In addition to sharing the municipal legislative powers with the
town meeting, the council is vested with the executive-administrative authority of the
town. The council then appoints a town manager who is accorded supervisory, appointment
and budgetary authority. In several instances, however, the council itself has some
administrative duties (i.e., serving as overseers of the poor, assessors, road
commissioners). In other cases, the council may appoint the clerk, tax collector,
treasurer, health officer or other municipal officials.
top
Return to Manager Plan Table of Contents
Town
Meeting-Selectmen-Manager Form
More than one quarter of all Maine
municipalities and two-thirds of those with managers operate under the town
meeting-selectmen-manager form of government. This form of government is most frequently
found in municipalities with populations between 1,000 and 3,000. Under this form, the
town meeting is vested with the general legislative powers of the town; while a board of
three, five or seven part-time selectmen, acting as a body, is the plural executive agency
which collectively interprets the wishes of the town meeting between sessions. Statute now
vests municipal officers with authority to adopt ordinances regulating public ways,
property and vehicles (30 M.R.S.A., Section 2151 (2-3)). The town meeting determines
policies of the town and the board of selectmen may interpret them on a day-to-day basis.
The extent of discretion and leadership exercised by boards of selectmen, however, will
vary among towns and will depend somewhat on recent history, town traditions and the
particular nature of matters under consideration.
The administrative duties of the town are
typically distributed among the board of selectmen, the manager and other elected officers
such as clerks, treasurers, tax collectors, etc. At least 14 Maine towns have the town
meeting-selectmen-manager form by virtue of pre-home rule special legislative (act)
charters. Many such charters were adopted prior to the passage of the town manager
enabling act in 1939. From 1939 until 1970, all towns operating under this form of
government did so under the town manager enabling act. Of those municipalities adopting
this form of government since 1970, approximately half have adopted this form of
government through the town manager enabling act.
The town of Sanford operates under a
limited town meeting form of government with a five member board of selectmen. These
representatives are elected from districts to attend the town meeting. Any voter may speak
at the town meeting, but only the elected representatives may vote. While two other Maine
towns once operated under this form of government (Old Orchard Beach and Caribou), only
Sanford continues the limited town meeting today.
Over the years, certain defects in the
operation of town government under the 1939 act, as amended, became evident. For example,
the act did not clearly define the duties of the manager. Dr. Dow made this point in a
1958 newsletter article:
Under Maine law the
voters in town meeting may decide what offices the manager shall hold, or may delegate
this authority to the selectmen. Thus the authority of the manager in a Maine town may
vary from year to year, and may be quite different from his neighbor in the next town. The
voters may continue to elect the treasurer, and the selectmen may decide to give the
manager the job of road commissioner while appointing someone else tax collector.
All sorts of combinations are possible, many of them resulting in a job which may resemble
a chief water boy more than it does a chief administrative officer. In too many
Maine towns the duties of selectmen and manager have never been clearly delineated, with
buck passing, confusion and inefficiency the inevitable consequence (Dow, 1958, pp. 3-4).
Among other problems with the plan was the
lack of a defined role of the board of selectmen vis-a-vis administration and the failure
to delegate to the manager sufficient formal authority to implement policies.
In 1969, the 104th Legislature repealed
the amended version of the 1939 act and substituted in its place a new and more
comprehensive town manager enabling act. The new act restates the powers and duties of the
manager expressed in the previous enabling act and defines for the first time some new
managerial powers and duties. [For
a more detailed analysis of the differences between the new and old acts, as amended, see
James J. Haag, "The Manager Plan - Something Old - Something New, " Maine
Town and City Management Association Newsletter XVII, No. 8, May 1970, pp. 1-5]. Those managerial
duties expressed in the original 1939 act are restated: to execute municipal laws and
ordinances, to attend board of selectmen meetings, except when removal of the manager is
being considered, to act as town purchasing agent, to advise selectmen and residents
concerning the town financial condition, and to make recommendations for the more
efficient operation of the town.
The 1969 act designated the manager as
"chief executive and administrative officer of the municipality," responsible to
the selectmen for administration of all offices under the selectmen. The act gives the
manager some authority to carry out this responsibility through the power to
"appoint, subject to the confirmation of the selectmen, supervise, control and remove
the heads of departments under the control of the selectmen." The manager also was
given authority to "appoint, supervise, control and remove all other officials,
subordinates and assistants." Other new duties assigned to the manager were: to
attend all meetings and hearings of the town, to collect data necessary for budget
preparation and to assist, insofar as possible, residents and taxpayers in discovering
their lawful remedies in cases involving complaints of unfair vendor, administrative and
governmental practices.
This act includes provisions dealing with
managerial qualifications, tenure, absence and disability, and defines the municipality's
ordinance power in administrative matters. It also defines the role of the selectmen and
clarifies the relationship of the selectmen to the manager and the administrative
organization. The board of selectmen as a body is vested with the executive and
administrative powers of the town, but the board is required to deal with the
administration of the town solely through the manager. The selectmen are forbidden to give
orders to managerial subordinates either publicly or privately, but the selectmen may
conduct investigations into the conduct of any official or department on any matter
related to the welfare of the municipality.
As originally passed in 1969, the new town
manager law would have required that only the selectmen and the school committee be
elected. All other officers of the town including the clerk, treasurer, assessors and
overseers of the poor would have been appointed by the manager, subject to confirmation by
the board of selectmen under the law as passed in 1969. In the 1970 special session of the
104th Legislature, this provision was amended to provide that unless the town otherwise
designates, the moderator, assessors, overseers of the poor, clerk and treasurer continue
to be elected.
The effect of the revised act as amended,
therefore, is to permit towns at their own discretion to make all functional town offices
accountable to the manager through broad managerial appointing authority. This is
consistent with the manager's role as "chief executive and administrative official of
the municipality." Without the 1970 amendment, this arrangement would have been
mandatory, but with the law as it exists today, this arrangement may be adopted only if so
desired by the town. A 1970 survey indicated extensive limitations in the authority of
managers to appoint functional officers in Maine town meeting-selectmen-manager
municipalities. A 1991 survey identified similar, but less extensive, appointment
limitations. The definition of expanded managerial duties and the role of the selectmen in
the new act eliminates some of the ambiguity and varied practices prevalent under the old
act.
top
Return to Manager Plan Table of Contents
The
Mayor-Council-Administrator Form
Four Maine municipalities have a
mayor-council-administrator form of government. These four cities are Biddeford, Saco,
Waterville, and Westbrook. In terms of population, the mayor-council-administrator form of
government is most common in communities with populations above 10,000. In this form of
government, the council is the representative legislative body with the mayor serving as
the chief administrative officer of the municipality and the administrator working
directly under the mayor. All four cities have councils, all are predominantly ward
elected, and have a part-time mayor elected at-large. Biddeford and Saco have weak
mayor-council forms, in which the elected mayor has limited controls over administration
but from time to time have experienced strong willed mayors. Both Waterville and Westbrook
vest the mayor with relatively strong authority to appoint city officials and direct
administration.
Under this form of government, the
mayor-council relationship is preserved. The council is vested with the bulk of
legislative powers, while the mayor is the chief executive officer and administrative head
of government. The office of the mayor continues to be elected and part-time. The mayor
appoints most officers and directs city administration. Much of the mayor's authority,
however, is delegated to the professional administrator who is directly accountable to the
mayor for extensive supervision of day-to-day administration. Thus, the mayor has more
time available for analyzing and developing policy and the broader considerations related
to administrative problems.
The mayor-council-administrator form of
government represents an attempt to wed politics with professionalism. It is clear,
however, that this form places highest priority on the ability of the administrator and
the mayor to work closely together and to operate as a team. Frequent turnover of the
office of the mayor may tend to make the administrative officer a precarious position.
Different personalities and leadership styles, and the distinct political persuasion of
the various mayors may result in frequent turnover in the office of the professional
administrator.
top
Return to Manager Plan Table of Contents
Town
Meeting-Selectmen-Administrative Assistant Form
The Town Meeting-Selectmen-Administrative
Assistant form of government operates in about 8 percent of Maine municipalities. It is
most characteristic of smaller communities, since 95% of Administrative Assistants operate
in municipalities with populations under 3,000 and over three-quarters under 2,000 in
population. While technically an administrative variation of the town meeting-selectmen
form of government, it has become increasingly popular in Maine. Although in some
municipalities the administrative assistant performs many of the same duties as a manager,
the board of selectmen has final administrative authority. In many cases the town
meeting-selectmen-administrative assistant form has replaced the town
meeting-selectmen-form, with the administrative assistant serving as the tax collector,
treasurer, and clerk. The reasons for a municipality to change to an administrative
assistant form of government vary widely, but some general observations have been
suggested by Michael Starn, Editor of the Maine Townsman:
Growth
pressures, the increasing complexities of government, and the time commitment required of
selectmen have all contributed to the decision in a number of small communities to explore
the alternative forms of government available to them. For those communities deciding to
create an administrative assistant position, the underlying reason has been a reluctance
to make the jump from a selectmen/town meeting to a selectmen/manager/town meeting form of
government...those communities opting for the selectmen/administrative assistant have felt
that this arrangement gives selectmen and townspeople more control over the affairs of
town government (Starn, October 1987, pp. 11-14).
Regardless of the underlying reason to
adopt the town meeting-selectmen-administrative assistant form of government, the
significant number of adoptions since 1985 (1/3 of the total) indicates the trend is
likely to continue.
top
Return to Manager Plan Table of Contents
|