Evolutionary biology: Channels
of resistance
Rory Howlett
Nature 434, 716 (7 April 2005) | doi: 10.1038/434716a
Two studies reported in this issue provide striking examples of how
biologists are getting to grips with adaptive diversification at the
molecular level. They deal with two very different animals — one
a marine invertebrate and the other a terrestrial vertebrate.
The softshell clam (Mya arenaria) occurs around the Atlantic coast of
North America. The clams can become contaminated with saxitoxin, the
cause of paralytic shellfish poisoning in humans and economic losses
to the shellfish industry. The toxin is produced by 'red tide' algae
and finds its way into the clams when the algae are ingested. V. Monica
Bricelj et al. (Nature 434, 763-767; 2005) show that clams from
areas subject to recurrent red tides are relatively resistant to the
toxin and tend to accumulate it in their tissues. But clams from unaffected
areas have low resistance when exposed to the toxin in the laboratory.
These differences were mirrored by the sensitivity of isolated clam
nerve-trunks exposed to the toxin in vitro.
To investigate the underlying molecular mechanism, Bricelj et al. sequenced
the genomic region encoding a putative voltage-gated sodium channel.
Such channels sit in cell membranes and regulate ion flow. The authors
found a single mutation that correlated with resistance to the toxin,
and that results in replacement of a glutamic acid by aspartic acid
at a site previously implicated in the binding of saxitoxin. When introduced
into a channel from rat brain, this mutation did not affect ion conductance.
But the sensitivity of the channel to saxitoxin was greatly reduced
owing to a large decrease in the binding affinity of the toxin at the
channel pore.
Saxitoxin produced by red-tide algae probably acts as a potent selective
agent on the clams, leading to genetic adaptation, the target of selection
being genetic variation at a single site in an ion channel.
E. D. BRODIE
But this phenomenon is not unique to clams. Saxitoxin is related to
another nerve poison called tetrodotoxin (TTX). In some populations
of the newt Taricha granulosa, individuals accumulate large amounts
of TTX in their skin as a defence against garter snakes (Thamnophis
sirtalis; pictured). As a result, the snakes that prey on toxic newts
have evolved high levels of resistance to the toxin. Shana L. Geffeney
et al. (Nature 434, 759-763; 2005) show that variation in the level
of resistance of garter snakes co-evolving with their newt prey can
be traced to molecular changes that affect the binding of TTX to —
you guessed it — a sodium channel.
So similar mechanisms underlie the adaptation of both softshell clams
and garter snakes to regular neurotoxin exposure. Evolution is baroque
in its many aspects, but is sometimes more predictable than we imagine.